How to Evidence Outcomes from Assistive Technology in Your Bids


📝 This is blog 3 of a 7-part series exploring how domiciliary care providers can strengthen their bids by linking reablement, assistive technology, and outcomes; links to all 7 below.


Assistive technology (AT) is becoming a core expectation in domiciliary care tenders — but simply saying you use it isn’t enough. Commissioners want to see clear, measurable outcomes that prove it’s making a difference. Many providers work with a domiciliary care bid writer to make sure outcomes are explained in ways that align with commissioner priorities.

The strongest bids don’t just describe the tech — they show the impact.


📊 What Counts as an Outcome?

Commissioners are looking for AT outcomes that support their priorities — often focused on independence, safety, reduced care hours, or faster recovery.

That might include:

  • ✅ Reduced number of daily care calls
  • ✅ Shortened reablement durations
  • ✅ Fewer hospital admissions or emergency visits
  • ✅ Improved medication compliance via eMAR or alerts
  • ✅ Increased time spent independently out of the home

Wherever possible, give real figures or percentages — even if based on a small sample. If you’re preparing a home care tender, linking these outcomes to system savings is especially powerful.


📖 Use Case Examples That Feel Real

Case studies (even short ones) bring credibility. Focus on what changed as a result of AT:

“We supported a client post-discharge using motion sensors and digital prompts. Over four weeks, they regained confidence to prepare meals independently, reducing care from 4 to 2 visits per day.”

It doesn’t have to be dramatic — just honest and outcome-focused.


📌 Link Outcomes to Wider Goals

Go beyond the individual. How do your AT outcomes help:

  • Reduce pressure on hospital discharge services?
  • Minimise unnecessary double-up visits?
  • Support the local authority’s digital care agenda?

Commissioners often have regional strategies around digital transformation. Your bid should reflect those ambitions.


✅ Include Outcomes in the Right Sections

You don’t have to wait for an “Outcomes” question. AT outcomes can strengthen:

  • Your service model (e.g. “We use AT to minimise over-support”)
  • Your staffing approach (e.g. “AT enables safer lone working”)
  • Your quality assurance section (e.g. “Outcomes tracked monthly via audit dashboard”)

Weave them in wherever they fit naturally — not just as a standalone bolt-on. If you’d like your bid checked for consistency and clarity, our specialist proofreading service ensures your evidence reads clearly and persuasively.


💼 Rapid Support Products (fast turnaround options)


🚀 Need a Bid Writing Quote?

If you’re exploring support for an upcoming tender or framework, request a quick, no-obligation quote. I’ll review your documents and respond with:

  • A clear scope of work
  • Estimated days required
  • A fixed fee quote
  • Any risks, considerations or quick wins
📄 Request a Bid Writing Quote →

🔁 Prefer Flexible Monthly Support?

If you regularly handle tenders, frameworks or call-offs, a Monthly Bid Support Retainer may be a better fit.

  • Guaranteed hours each month (1, 2, 4 or 8 days)
  • Discounted day rates vs ad-hoc consultancy
  • Use time flexibly across bids, triage, library updates, renewals
  • One-month rollover (fair-use rules applied)
  • Cancel anytime before next billing date
Explore Monthly Retainers →

🚀 Ready to Win Your Next Bid?

Chat on WhatsApp or email Mike.Harrison@impact-guru.co.uk

Updated for Procurement Act 2023 • CQC-aligned • BASE-aligned (where relevant)


📚 Read the full 7-part blog series on Reablement and Assistive Technology in Domiciliary Care Bids:

  1. 🧠 Why Assistive Technology Matters in Domiciliary Care Tenders
  2. 🏃 Reablement Is More Than a Buzzword — Make It Count in Bids
  3. 📊 How to Evidence Outcomes from Assistive Technology in Your Bids
  4. 🏗️ Writing a Strong Service Model That Includes Reablement
  5. 📲 What Commissioners Want to See in Your Digital Care Planning Approach
  6. 🚫 Avoiding Common Pitfalls When Writing About Tech in Tenders
  7. 🔗 How to Link Reablement, Tech, and Outcomes in One Clear Narrative

Written by Impact Guru, editorial oversight by Mike Harrison, Founder of Impact Guru Ltd — bringing extensive experience in health and social care tenders, commissioning and strategy.

⬅️ Return to Knowledge Hub Index

🔗 Useful Tender Resources

✍️ Service support:

🔍 Quality boost:

🎯 Build foundations: