Why Co-Production Matters in Social Care
Share
π Blog 1 of 7 in our Co-Production & Engagement Series
Why Co-Production Matters in Social Care
Links to all 7 blogs in this series are at the bottom of this post.
π€ Co-Production = Voice, Choice, and Partnership
In social care, co-production is not a buzzword β itβs about ensuring that the voices of people with lived experience directly shape services. True engagement goes beyond consultation: it means designing, delivering, and reviewing services together with people supported, families, and communities.
Commissioners and the CQC increasingly expect co-production evidence in method statements, strategies, and inspections. Itβs linked to outcomes, human rights, and quality β and services that can demonstrate it often score higher in tenders and perform better in ratings.
π What Commissioners Expect
Commissioners want providers to evidence how co-production and engagement lead to better outcomes and stronger services. High-scoring responses typically include:
- Service design β examples of people with lived experience shaping new services or pilots.
- Ongoing involvement β how service users and families are engaged in policy reviews, training design, or recruitment panels.
- Diverse voices β inclusion of people from different backgrounds, communication needs, and communities.
- Feedback loop β βYou said, we didβ reporting that shows learning and change.
For example, in a learning disability tender, commissioners expect to see how families and advocates shape PBS plans. In a domiciliary care bid, it might be service users co-designing rotas or digital tools for care planning.
ποΈ What Inspectors Look For
The CQC places co-production under the Well-Led and Responsive domains. Inspectors look for evidence that providers are not just talking about engagement but embedding it:
- Structured involvement β advisory groups, service user forums, or co-production boards.
- Representation β service users on interview panels, governance meetings, or strategy workshops.
- Impact β evidence of changes made because of lived-experience feedback.
- Accessibility β materials and forums adapted for communication, culture, and capacity.
π§ Core Elements of Co-Production
- Equal partnership β treating lived experience as expertise.
- Capacity-building β training and supporting people to contribute meaningfully.
- Diverse engagement β reaching seldom-heard groups (e.g., people with profound disabilities, carers, minority communities).
- Feedback culture β visible processes that show input is acted on.
- Governance β co-production reported to the board and linked to QA cycles.
Many providers embed this through a bid strategy process, ensuring their engagement evidence is captured, structured, and ready for tenders.
β οΈ Risks of Weak Co-Production
- Tokenism β consultation without influence undermines trust.
- Exclusion β not adapting processes excludes people with communication or cultural needs.
- Lack of evidence β engagement not recorded or reported canβt be evidenced in tenders or inspections.
These risks weaken both trust and competitive standing. Strong, documented co-production creates credibility with commissioners, inspectors, and communities.
π‘ Practical Example
Scenario: A supported living provider redesigns shift patterns after feedback that late-night changes caused anxiety for people with autism.
- Engage: Service user forum raises the issue; advocates support communication.
- Co-design: Service users, families, and staff work together to trial new fixed-shift patterns.
- Implement: Pilot introduced; feedback gathered after 4 weeks.
- Report: βYou said, we didβ update shows reduced incidents and better sleep patterns.
In a tender, this would evidence both engagement and outcomes β strengthening the bid.
π οΈ Practical Tips for Providers
- Make every answer scorable: mirror the questionβs headings, signpost clearly, and prove each claim with a concise data point or example.
- Standardise your toolkit: keep one live set of method statements, annexes and KPIs so teams arenβt reinventing content each time.
- Protect word counts: prioritise impact lines, cut duplication, and move low-value detail into annexes or tables.
- Evidence cadence: publish a quarterly mini βcommissioner packβ (KPI trends, governance actions, case studies) so renewals are never a scramble.
- Triaging discipline: only pursue tenders where you can evidence fit, safe mobilisation and measurable outcomes at the proposed price.
π€ Need a hand putting this into practice?
Start with a quick quality lift via:
Protect your pipeline using:
Build re-usable foundations with:
Keep performance βrenewal-readyβ through:
If you need a bigger reset to map your needs:
πΌ Rapid Support Products (fast turnaround options)
- β‘ 48-Hour Tender Triage
- π Bid Rescue Session β 60 minutes
- βοΈ Score Booster β Tender Answer Rewrite
- π§© Tender Answer Blueprint
- π Tender Proofreading & Light Editing
- π Pre-Tender Readiness Audit
- π Tender Document Review
π Need a Bid Writing Quote?
If youβre exploring support for an upcoming tender or framework, request a quick, no-obligation quote. Iβll review your documents and respond with:
- A clear scope of work
- Estimated days required
- A fixed fee quote
- Any risks, considerations or quick wins
π Prefer Flexible Monthly Support?
If you regularly handle tenders, frameworks or call-offs, a Monthly Bid Support Retainer may be a better fit.
- Guaranteed hours each month (1, 2, 4 or 8 days)
- Discounted day rates vs ad-hoc consultancy
- Use time flexibly across bids, triage, library updates, renewals
- One-month rollover (fair-use rules applied)
- Cancel anytime before next billing date
π Ready to Win Your Next Bid?
Chat on WhatsApp or email Mike.Harrison@impact-guru.co.uk
Updated for Procurement Act 2023 β’ CQC-aligned β’ BASE-aligned (where relevant)
π Catch up on the full Co-Production & Engagement Series:
- π Why Co-Production Matters in Social Care
- π§ Principles of Co-Production: From Tokenism to True Partnership
- π₯ Involving Families and Carers in Service Design
- ποΈ Co-Production in Governance and Quality Assurance
- π Building Engagement Pathways for Under-Represented Voices
- π‘ Case Studies: Co-Production That Changed Services
- π Evidencing Co-Production in Tenders and Inspections