Building Engagement Pathways for Under-Represented Voices


πŸ“˜ Blog 5 of 7 in our Co-Production & Engagement Series
Building Engagement Pathways for Under-Represented Voices

Links to all 7 blogs in this series are at the bottom of this post.


🌍 Why Inclusion Matters

In social care, co-production often risks being shaped by the most confident or articulate voices. This leaves out groups who may face communication barriers, cultural differences, or systemic marginalisation. True co-production means ensuring everyone’s perspective can shape services β€” not just those already comfortable speaking up.

Commissioners and inspectors increasingly ask: β€œHow do you ensure under-represented voices are heard?” Providers who can evidence this are seen as more inclusive, person-centred, and resilient.


🧭 Identifying Under-Represented Voices

Groups often under-represented in co-production include:

  • People with learning disabilities or limited communication.
  • Individuals with mental health conditions who may not attend formal meetings.
  • Older adults with dementia or frailty.
  • Ethnic minority groups facing cultural or language barriers.
  • Unpaid carers with limited time to engage.

By recognising who is missing from the conversation, providers can design targeted engagement pathways.


πŸ› οΈ Practical Approaches

  • Accessible formats β€” Easy Read, translated materials, pictorial surveys.
  • Community partners β€” faith groups, advocacy services, local charities acting as bridges.
  • Flexible engagement β€” home visits, telephone surveys, short online polls.
  • Assistive technology β€” voice-to-text, captioning, communication aids.
  • Safe spaces β€” culturally appropriate or trauma-informed forums where people feel able to speak freely.

These approaches show commissioners that you go beyond β€œtick-box” engagement β€” you proactively create equity.


πŸ’‘ Practical Example (Learning Disability Supported Living)

Scenario: A provider wants to gather feedback from people with profound communication needs.

  • ❌ Weak approach: Sending a written survey to all residents.
  • βœ… Stronger approach: Keyworkers use communication passports and symbols to gather responses; family carers attend feedback sessions; an independent advocate validates findings.

By adapting the pathway, the provider evidences inclusive engagement that shapes service improvements.


πŸ“£ Tender and Inspection Relevance

Commissioners reward bids that show clear pathways for under-represented voices. For example:

For inspections, inclusive co-production links directly to Well-Led and Responsive domains.


🀝 Need a hand putting this into practice?

Start with a quick quality lift via:

Protect your pipeline using:

Build re-usable foundations with:

Keep performance β€œrenewal-ready” through:

If you need a bigger reset to map your needs:


πŸ“š Catch up on the full Co-Production & Engagement Series:

  1. πŸ“˜ Why Co-Production Matters in Social Care
  2. 🧭 Principles of Co-Production: From Tokenism to True Partnership
  3. πŸ‘₯ Involving Families and Carers in Service Design
  4. πŸ›οΈ Co-Production in Governance and Quality Assurance
  5. 🌍 Building Engagement Pathways for Under-Represented Voices
  6. πŸ’‘ Case Studies: Co-Production That Changed Services
  7. πŸ“„ Evidencing Co-Production in Tenders and Inspections

Written by Mike Harrison, Founder of Impact Guru Ltd β€” specialists in bid writing, strategy and developing specialist tools to support social care providers to prioritise workflow, win and retain more contracts.

⬅️ Return to Knowledge Hub Index

πŸ”— Useful Tender Resources

✍️ Service support:

πŸ” Quality boost:

🎯 Build foundations: