Testing and Reviewing Your Continuity Plan — Social Care Business Continuity

August 30, 2025

🔁 Blog 6 of 7 in our Business Continuity Series
Testing and Reviewing Your Continuity Plan — Social Care Business Continuity

Links to all 7 blogs in this series are at the bottom of this post.

🔁 Why Testing and Reviewing Matters

Many providers fall into the trap of treating continuity plans as “shelf documents” — produced once for compliance and then forgotten. But a plan that hasn’t been tested is simply theory. Commissioners and the CQC want assurance that your Business Continuity Strategy and emergency planning policy are living documents, updated through regular drills and reviews.

Testing answers the question: will your plan work in practice? Reviewing ensures lessons are captured and improvements made. Together, they show resilience is embedded, not aspirational.

🧪 Ways to Test Your Continuity Plan

Testing doesn’t always mean full-scale simulations. Providers can use different methods depending on resources:

Tabletop exercises — managers walk through a disruption scenario step by step, identifying gaps and decision points.
Live drills — testing specific responses (e.g. activating backup paper records during an IT outage).
Partnership simulations — working with commissioners, agencies, or local authorities to test joint responses.
After-action reviews — using real incidents as testing opportunities and reviewing how effective responses were.

For example, a domiciliary care provider might run a half-day exercise simulating snow disruption, reassigning staff, and testing commissioner notification procedures. These drills not only build confidence but provide strong evidence in tenders.

💡 Example in Practice

Two providers both face a local power outage:

❌ Provider A scrambles to find torches and paper records. Staff are unclear on next steps, and commissioner updates are delayed. Families lose confidence.
✅ Provider B runs an annual utilities disruption drill. Staff know exactly where emergency equipment is stored, who contacts families, and how care is recorded. The disruption is managed seamlessly, and evidence of the drill is logged in the continuity strategy.

📊 What Commissioners and CQC Look For

Both commissioners and inspectors want to see that testing is systematic, recorded, and used to drive improvement. High-scoring responses in tenders will show:

Frequency — how often continuity drills or reviews are carried out.
Participation — whether all relevant staff, not just managers, are involved.
Learning — how lessons are documented and acted upon.
Integration — how testing links into wider quality assurance and risk management cycles.

A learning disability provider that can show how it tested PBS staff redeployment during a safeguarding drill, and then improved its processes as a result, will secure higher commissioner confidence than a provider who simply states “we review policies annually.”

🔄 Building Reviews into Your Governance Cycle

Reviewing continuity is not just about crisis events — it should be part of your broader governance. That means:

Including continuity in quarterly management meetings.
Updating risk registers after each incident or drill.
Capturing staff and family feedback after disruptions.
Recording evidence for tenders and inspections.

This approach turns continuity from a static document into a dynamic learning process. Working with a bid proofreading service can ensure these examples are expressed clearly in tenders.

🧰 Practical Next Steps for Providers

Schedule at least one continuity drill per year (e.g. IT outage or staffing crisis).
Record outcomes and lessons in your emergency planning policy.
Update your continuity strategy with each review cycle.
Use real incidents as learning opportunities, not just compliance exercises.
Evidence testing in tender method statements to demonstrate credibility.

Item added to your cart