Recognising Abuse, Neglect & Self-Neglect in Social Care


🧭 Blog 2 of 7 in our Expanded Safeguarding Series
Recognising Abuse, Neglect & Self-Neglect (Including Modern Slavery & Domestic Abuse)

Links to all 7 blogs in this series are at the bottom of this post.


πŸ‘οΈ Recognition = The First Line of Defence

Safeguarding begins with recognition. Unless staff can identify the signs of abuse, neglect, or self-neglect, no further action can happen. Commissioners and inspectors are clear: providers must evidence not only that staff are trained, but that they know how to spot, record, and act.

Weak tender responses often say, β€œStaff are trained in safeguarding.” Strong responses show what staff are trained to look for, how training is refreshed, and how recognition links directly to escalation pathways. That’s why many providers choose to use tender-ready method statements or refine responses through specialist proofreading β€” to ensure recognition is evidenced, not assumed.


πŸ“‘ Categories of Abuse & Neglect

The Care Act 2014 sets out 10 categories of abuse and neglect. Staff should recognise all of them:

  • Physical abuse β€” hitting, slapping, inappropriate restraint.
  • Domestic abuse β€” including controlling, coercive, and economic abuse.
  • Sexual abuse β€” exploitation, assault, or harassment.
  • Psychological abuse β€” threats, humiliation, isolation, cyber-bullying.
  • Financial or material abuse β€” theft, fraud, pressure around wills or property.
  • Modern slavery β€” trafficking, forced labour, domestic servitude.
  • Discriminatory abuse β€” harassment or unfair treatment due to protected characteristics.
  • Organisational abuse β€” poor practice, unsafe culture, systemic neglect.
  • Neglect and acts of omission β€” failing to meet basic needs, including nutrition and medication.
  • Self-neglect β€” inability to care for personal hygiene, nutrition, health, or environment.

Commissioners expect to see these categories named explicitly in tenders. For example, a learning disability bid might show how staff are trained to recognise subtle signs of psychological abuse in non-verbal communication. A domiciliary care submission might highlight financial abuse indicators during home visits. A home care tender could show processes for spotting self-neglect in older adults living alone.


πŸ” Why Recognition Is So Difficult

Even experienced staff can miss abuse if they are rushed, unsupported, or unsure. Common barriers include:

  • Normalisation β€” assuming bruises or weight loss are β€œexpected signs of ageing.”
  • Fear of consequences β€” staff worried about β€œgetting it wrong.”
  • Lack of confidence β€” uncertainty about what constitutes a safeguarding concern.
  • Hidden harm β€” coercion, financial abuse, or psychological abuse often leave no physical signs.

That’s why commissioners want to see more than annual training. They look for reflective supervision, case-based learning, and scenario testing β€” approaches best set out in a safeguarding strategy or bid strategy training session.


πŸ’‘ Practical Examples

Example 1 (Domiciliary Care): A care worker spots unopened medication and poor food in the fridge. Rather than ignoring it, they record observations, raise a safeguarding concern, and trigger a joint visit with social workers.

Example 2 (Learning Disability Services): A non-verbal individual begins resisting support with unexplained anxiety. Staff use body mapping, observe behaviour changes, and escalate to the safeguarding lead, who involves advocacy.

Example 3 (Modern Slavery): A new staff member discloses that they were forced to hand over wages by a third party. Clear escalation routes ensure this is reported to the local authority and police.


πŸ“Š How to Evidence Recognition in Tenders & Inspections

  • Training detail β€” % staff trained, refresher cycles, specialist modules (e.g. domestic abuse, LPS, modern slavery).
  • Supervision evidence β€” how staff reflection includes safeguarding case discussions.
  • Case studies β€” anonymised examples showing recognition ➜ escalation ➜ outcome.
  • Data trends β€” number of safeguarding concerns raised, resolved, and themes tracked at governance level.

Inspection teams reward providers who can prove that staff don’t just know the policy, but can spot and act in real-world scenarios.


πŸ“š Catch up on the full Expanded Safeguarding Series:

  1. πŸ“˜ Why Safeguarding Matters in Social Care
  2. 🧭 Recognising Abuse, Neglect & Self-Neglect (Including Modern Slavery & Domestic Abuse)
  3. πŸ”” Thresholds, Referrals & Section 42: Getting the Response Right
  4. 🀝 Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) & Advocacy in Practice
  5. 🧩 Multi-Agency Working, Information-Sharing & Record-Keeping
  6. 🧯 Building a Speak-Up Culture: Whistleblowing, Supervision & Debriefs
  7. πŸ“„ Evidencing Safeguarding in Tenders & Inspections

Written by Mike Harrison, Founder of Impact Guru Ltd β€” specialists in bid writing and strategy for social care providers

Visit impact-guru.co.ukΒ to browse downloadable strategies, method statements, or get in touch about tender support.

⬅️ Return to Knowledge Hub Index

πŸ”— Useful Tender Resources

Explore more guides, tools, and services to strengthen your next bid:

✍️ Service support:

πŸ” Quality boost:

🎯 Level up:

πŸ“¦ Toolkits & bundles:

🧭 Browse related articles: