Gathering Evidence: Audits, Feedback, and Outcomes

September 2, 2025

📊 Blog 3 of 7 in our Quality Assurance Series
Gathering Evidence: Audits, Feedback, and Outcomes

Links to all 7 blogs in this series are at the bottom of this post.

📑 Evidence = Credibility

When it comes to quality assurance (QA), evidence is everything. Commissioners and CQC inspectors are not swayed by intentions — they want to see data, outcomes, and feedback that prove your service delivers. Gathering evidence systematically shows that your QA framework isn’t just theoretical; it works in practice.

This is why so many tender questions explicitly ask for method statements on audits, service feedback, and outcomes. Providers who can demonstrate evidence clearly — whether through a Quality Assurance Strategy, strong reporting cycles, or independent tender reviews — will always score higher.

🧾 Audits That Go Beyond Compliance

Audits are the backbone of evidence. But not all audits are created equal. Commissioners and inspectors want to see structured, risk-based audits that actually drive improvement. Good audit practice includes:

Frequency with purpose — e.g. monthly care plan audits, quarterly safeguarding audits, annual medicines audits.
Consistency — standardised templates so data can be compared across teams or services.
Follow-up — action plans, owners, deadlines, and evidence of improvement (not just findings left on a shelf).
Visibility — results shared at service QA meetings and escalated to organisational governance cycles.

For learning disability bids, audits might include PBS plan reviews or communication support audits. In home care submissions, spot checks on visit punctuality and medicines handling are critical. Tailoring audits to your service model makes the evidence relevant and persuasive.

👂 Listening to People and Families

Feedback is evidence — not just reassurance. Commissioners and inspectors want to see systematic approaches to capturing the voices of people supported and their families. That means:

Routine satisfaction surveys (short, accessible formats).
Structured conversations during reviews and supervisions.
Family forums or advisory groups with action follow-up.
“You said, we did” updates to show responsiveness.

Embedding family and advocate voices into QA cycles demonstrates transparency and co-production. For example, a domiciliary care bid that evidences monthly family feedback forums is far stronger than one that simply states “we seek feedback regularly.”

📊 Outcomes That Demonstrate Impact

Ultimately, QA evidence must go beyond activity and show impact. Commissioners want to see how your service changes lives. Outcomes evidence might include:

Reduction in falls, pressure sores, or medication errors.
Improved satisfaction scores among people supported and families.
Progression outcomes in independence, community engagement, or wellbeing.
Workforce stability metrics — reduced turnover and sickness rates.

Providers often embed outcomes into their bid strategy training, ensuring staff can explain how evidence links to tenders. In inspection, outcome evidence proves the service is not only compliant but effective and person-centred.

💡 Practical Example

Consider two providers reporting on medicines safety:

❌ Provider A: “We complete annual medicines audits.”
✅ Provider B: “We complete quarterly medicines audits. Last year, errors reduced by 46% after introducing a double-check system. Families reported increased confidence, and satisfaction scores improved from 78% to 92%.”

Both mention audits, but only one demonstrates impact backed by data and feedback. That’s the difference commissioners and inspectors score highly.

🧰 Practical Tips for Gathering Evidence

Use standard templates for audits to ensure consistency.
Embed “you said, we did” into service communications.
Track KPIs over time to show improvement, not just snapshots.
Link outcomes directly to your method statements so tenders evidence credibility.
Have evidence packs ready for CQC inspections and tender submissions.

Item added to your cart