Using Risk Assessments to Enable Independence in ABI Services
Risk assessments are often viewed as tools to prevent activity rather than enable it. In acquired brain injury services, this approach can unintentionally limit recovery and independence. Commissioners and inspectors increasingly expect ABI providers to demonstrate how risk assessments are used dynamically to support positive risk-taking rather than impose blanket restriction.
This article explores how risk assessments should be used to enable independence in ABI services. It should be read alongside Positive Risk-Taking & Risk Enablement and Outcomes, Independence & Community Inclusion.
Why traditional risk assessment falls short in ABI
Static, generic risk assessments fail to reflect recovery, learning and changing ability common in ABI support.
Commissioner and inspector expectations
Expectation 1: Individualised assessment. Inspectors expect risk assessments to reflect the person, not the service.
Expectation 2: Ongoing review. Commissioners expect risk assessments to change as progress is made.
Operational example 1: Staged independence planning
An ABI service linked risk assessments to stages of independence, allowing risk to be enabled incrementally.
Linking risk assessments to outcomes
Risk assessments should clearly reference personal goals and desired outcomes.
Operational example 2: Outcome-linked risk reviews
A provider reviewed risks alongside outcome progress, avoiding unnecessary restriction.
Responding to setbacks without reverting to blanket restriction
Setbacks should trigger review and adaptation rather than automatic withdrawal of independence.
Operational example 3: Proportionate response frameworks
A service used proportionate response frameworks to manage setbacks while maintaining enablement.
Evidencing enabling risk practice
Providers should evidence:
- Dynamic, individualised risk assessments
- Clear links to independence goals
- Regular review and learning
Risk assessment as a tool for progress
In ABI services, effective risk assessment enables progress, recovery and dignity when used dynamically and purposefully.
Latest from the knowledge hub
- Supported Decision-Making and Legal Capacity in Denmark: Protecting Autonomy Without Removing Necessary Safeguards
- What Happens When AI Becomes Part of Everyday Social Care Practice? Governance, Workforce and Person-Centred Care
- Winning Adult Social Care Contracts: Why Specialist Bid Expertise Still Matters in the Age of AI
- Disability Support Across Danish Municipalities: Can Local Flexibility Coexist With Consistent Individual Rights?