Using Communication to Maintain Identity and Dignity in Older People’s Services

For older people, communication is inseparable from dignity. How staff speak, listen, explain and respond communicates respect or disregard, often more powerfully than any written policy. Poor communication can leave people feeling invisible, rushed or infantilised, even when physical care is delivered safely.

Maintaining dignity through communication is a core expectation of commissioners and regulators. It also directly affects complaints, safeguarding concerns and staff confidence. This work aligns closely with Person-Centred Planning in Social Care and Quality Assurance in Social Care.

What dignity-focused communication means in practice

Dignity-focused communication involves:

  • Using preferred names and titles consistently
  • Speaking to the person, not over or about them
  • Explaining what is happening before and during care
  • Offering choices and respecting decisions
  • Avoiding infantilising language or tone

Operational example 1: Restoring dignity during personal care

Context: An older person expressed embarrassment and withdrew during personal care, leading to refusal.

Support approach: Staff reviewed communication style and consent processes.

Day-to-day delivery detail: Staff explained each step in advance, asked permission before touching, used neutral adult language, and allowed the person to control pacing. Care plans documented preferred phrases and routines.

How effectiveness is evidenced: Reduced refusals, positive feedback, and observation records confirming respectful practice.

Operational example 2: Maintaining identity in residential care

Context: A resident felt “treated like a child” and disengaged from staff.

Support approach: Life story information was used to shape communication.

Day-to-day delivery detail: Staff addressed the resident using their professional title, engaged in conversation about past roles, and avoided collective language (“we’re all going to bed now”). These expectations were reinforced in supervision.

How effectiveness is evidenced: Improved engagement, reduced complaints, and staff able to describe the person’s identity confidently.

Operational example 3: Dignity in busy environments

Context: In a busy extra care scheme, residents reported feeling rushed and ignored.

Support approach: The service introduced communication standards focused on dignity.

Day-to-day delivery detail: Staff were trained to pause, make eye contact, explain delays and apologise when rushing was unavoidable. Staff avoided discussing care needs publicly and used private spaces for sensitive conversations.

How effectiveness is evidenced: Feedback surveys improved, complaints reduced, and observations showed calmer interactions.

Commissioner expectation (explicit)

Commissioner expectation: Commissioners expect providers to evidence dignity and respect through everyday practice. Communication standards should be embedded, monitored and linked to outcomes and complaints data.

Regulator / Inspector expectation (explicit)

Regulator / Inspector expectation (CQC): Inspectors will assess whether people are treated with dignity and respect at all times, including how staff communicate, seek consent and maintain privacy.

Governance and assurance mechanisms

  • Dignity-focused observation audits
  • Supervision prompts testing staff understanding
  • Feedback from people and families
  • Review of complaints and compliments
  • Training linked to real examples and scenarios

Key takeaway

Dignity is communicated minute by minute. Services that embed respectful communication protect identity, reduce risk and deliver inspection-ready evidence of quality.


💼 Rapid Support Products (fast turnaround options)


🚀 Need a Bid Writing Quote?

If you’re exploring support for an upcoming tender or framework, request a quick, no-obligation quote. I’ll review your documents and respond with:

  • A clear scope of work
  • Estimated days required
  • A fixed fee quote
  • Any risks, considerations or quick wins
📄 Request a Bid Writing Quote →

Written by Impact Guru, editorial oversight by Mike Harrison, Founder of Impact Guru Ltd — bringing extensive experience in health and social care tenders, commissioning and strategy.

⬅️ Return to Knowledge Hub Index

🔗 Useful Tender Resources

✍️ Service support:

🔍 Quality boost:

🎯 Build foundations: