Shared House or Self-Contained Flat? Choosing the Right Supported Living Property

When commissioners talk about Supported Living models, the conversation often centres on staffing and hours. But the property type you choose — shared house, self-contained flat or clustered scheme — has just as much impact on stability, risk and quality of life.

This article looks at how to decide what kind of home is right for each person, and how to describe that clearly in tenders.

It starts with the person, not the property

Strong providers don’t start with “we’ve got a 4-bed house to fill”. They start by asking:

  • What does this person find overwhelming or reassuring in a home?
  • How do they manage noise, other people and unexpected changes?
  • What does their PBS plan and risk profile suggest about proximity to others?
  • What are their long-term goals around independence and community?

Only then do you decide whether a shared house, flat or hybrid model makes sense.

Shared houses: pros and cons

Shared houses can work brilliantly when they are:

  • Genuinely small-scale and homely
  • Built around a compatible peer group, not just “who’s available”
  • Designed with both privacy and social space in mind

Potential benefits include:

  • Opportunities for friendship, mutual support and shared activities
  • Cost-effective staffing and night-time cover
  • A strong “family home” feel when well-matched

Risks to manage:

  • Compatibility issues leading to conflict or distress
  • Noise and sensory overload for autistic people
  • “Group rules” overriding individual choice and control

Self-contained flats and core-and-cluster models

Self-contained flats (often within a core-and-cluster scheme) can offer:

  • High levels of privacy and control
  • Reduced environmental triggers for people with complex trauma or distress responses
  • Flexible staffing (e.g. on-site staff base plus individual support hours)

They work particularly well for people who:

  • Are distressed by others’ noise, routines or behaviours
  • Have been in ATUs or secure settings and need a clear psychological “break” from institutional feel
  • Want to build independence at their own pace

Risks to manage:

  • Social isolation if people are left alone too much
  • Underestimating the support needed to manage a whole flat
  • Properties feeling “bedded out” or institutional if badly designed

Hybrid and stepped models

Some providers use a stepped approach, for example:

  • Starting in a flat within a staffed core-and-cluster scheme
  • Building skills and confidence with a clear progression plan
  • Moving on to a more independent tenancy in the community when ready

In tenders, this can be described as an outcomes-focused housing pathway, not just a static placement.

Matching people to property types

A strong matching process will:

  • Use information from support plans and reviews to shape housing decisions
  • Involve people and families in viewing and shortlisting properties
  • Consider location, transport and community assets as well as the building
  • Document why a shared house, flat or hybrid model was chosen for that person

Describing this clearly in tenders

Commissioners want to see more than “we offer shared homes and flats”. Help them understand that you:

  • Start with individual needs, not voids
  • Can offer a range of housing solutions (shared, flats, core-and-cluster)
  • Have a robust process for matching and move-in, with clear compatibility checks
  • Review housing suitability over time, not just at point of placement

When you can articulate why a particular property type suits a person — and how you’ll review this — commissioners are far more confident in your supported living model.


💼 Rapid Support Products (fast turnaround options)


🚀 Need a Bid Writing Quote?

If you’re exploring support for an upcoming tender or framework, request a quick, no-obligation quote. I’ll review your documents and respond with:

  • A clear scope of work
  • Estimated days required
  • A fixed fee quote
  • Any risks, considerations or quick wins
📄 Request a Bid Writing Quote →

📘 Monthly Bid Support Retainers

Want predictable, specialist bid support as Procurement Act 2023 and MAT scoring bed in? My Monthly Bid Support Retainers give NHS and social care providers flexible access to live tender support, opportunity triage, bid library updates and renewal planning — at a discounted day rate.

🔍 Explore Monthly Bid Support Retainers →

Written by Impact Guru, editorial oversight by Mike Harrison, Founder of Impact Guru Ltd — bringing extensive experience in health and social care tenders, commissioning and strategy.

⬅️ Return to Knowledge Hub Index

🔗 Useful Tender Resources

✍️ Service support:

🔍 Quality boost:

🎯 Build foundations: