Restrictive Practices in Social Care: The Fine Line Between Safety and Rights
Share
When we talk about restrictive practices in social care, we're not just talking about tools or protocols—we’re talking about real people’s freedom, dignity, and rights. This is where Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) faces one of its most important challenges: how do we safeguard individuals without violating their autonomy?
⚖️ Understanding the Role of Restrictive Practices
Restrictive interventions (e.g. physical holds, locked doors, enforced medication, constant supervision) are sometimes deemed necessary to prevent harm. But in PBS, these are considered last resorts, only used when all proactive, non-restrictive strategies have failed or in emergency situations.
According to the Restraint Reduction Network, good PBS plans must seek to:
- Minimise the use of all restrictive practices
- Ensure any restrictions used are the least restrictive option
- Involve the person and their advocates in every decision
🧍♀️ Rights-Based Approaches in PBS
All restrictive practices must be viewed through a human rights lens. Article 5 of the Human Rights Act protects individuals from unlawful deprivation of liberty. Article 8 supports the right to private and family life, including freedom of movement and autonomy.
If a person’s choices are being restricted, even for safety reasons, services must:
- Clearly document the legal basis (e.g. best interest decision, court order, Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards)
- Review regularly and reduce restrictions wherever possible
- Involve families, advocates and—where possible—the person themselves
🛑 From Routine to Reflective Practice
One of the biggest risks in social care is that restrictions become normalised. Doors stay locked. Staff say “we always do it this way.” But PBS demands reflection: Why is the restriction still in place? Is it still needed? What alternatives have we explored?
We need cultures that encourage staff to:
- Question routine restrictions
- Proactively reduce environmental triggers
- Reflect on incidents with curiosity, not blame
âś… Key Takeaways for Providers
- Never use restrictive practices without a clear, rights-based rationale
- Review PBS plans regularly with the goal of reducing restrictions
- Ensure all staff are trained in human rights and PBS values
- Document everything: decisions, alternatives considered, legal frameworks
Balancing safety and freedom is one of the hardest parts of care—but also one of the most important. The best services are those that treat restrictions as a red flag, not a routine.