Restrictive Practices and Human Rights — Rethinking Control Through Positive Behaviour Support (PBS)
Too often, restrictive practices are introduced as a response to risk. But Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) teaches us to start somewhere else: with rights, autonomy, and what truly matters to the person.
Across learning disability services, complex care contracts, and domiciliary care tenders, the conversation about restrictions is shifting. Commissioners and regulators are now asking deeper questions — not just how you keep people safe, but how you protect their freedom and dignity in doing so.
Our Bid Review & Proofreading Service helps providers evidence this balance clearly in tenders — showing how PBS, safeguarding, and rights-based governance connect to real outcomes. The culture of control is giving way to one of enablement — and this is where PBS shows its true value.
⚖️ Start with Human Rights
In Positive Behaviour Support, restrictions are never routine. Every decision that limits choice, movement, or communication carries ethical weight. A human-rights-based PBS approach ensures that restrictions are:
- ⏳ Time-limited — introduced only as long as necessary, with clear review dates.
- ⚖️ Proportionate — the least restrictive option available to achieve safety or wellbeing.
- 🧭 Rights-protecting — used only when they uphold the person’s dignity or prevent serious harm.
This approach reframes restrictive practice away from organisational protection and towards personal protection. The key question becomes: whose needs are being met? True PBS begins with purpose — not policy.
🧩 Make Rights Part of Your Culture
Embedding a rights-based culture isn’t achieved through paperwork — it’s achieved through mindset. The daily language staff use, the way managers discuss incidents, and the conversations families have about support all set the tone.
To build that culture:
- 💬 Train staff to ask before every intervention: “Is this respectful? Is this necessary?”
- 🧠 Encourage reflective practice sessions focused on alternatives to restrictions.
- 👥 Involve people and families in designing proactive strategies that reduce the need for control.
- 📚 Replace compliance language (“allowed”, “not allowed”) with autonomy-oriented phrasing (“supported”, “enabled”).
Every restriction is a dignity issue. Treat it that way, and you change your service culture from control to collaboration.
📉 Why Restrictive Practice Still Happens
Even in well-intentioned services, restrictions creep in because of fear — fear of harm, litigation, or CQC criticism. When staff feel unsupported or under pressure, restrictive practice can become the default rather than the exception.
Typical drivers include:
- ⛔ Limited training or confidence in de-escalation.
- ⏰ Time pressures that discourage proactive planning.
- 📋 Policies that emphasise safety more than autonomy.
- 🧍 Staff trauma from past incidents shaping future caution.
Addressing these drivers requires leadership courage — and the ability to articulate that balance clearly in tenders.
💡 The PBS Alternative — From Risk to Relationship
Positive Behaviour Support reframes behaviour as communication. Instead of reacting to behaviour, staff learn to respond to the message behind it. This changes everything:
- 🔍 Focus shifts from “How do we stop this?” to “What is this telling us?”
- 🤝 Relationships become the foundation for safety.
- 🌱 Risk is shared, understood, and mitigated collaboratively.
Where traditional models see “challenging behaviour”, PBS sees unmet need. Where others see control, PBS sees teaching and empowerment. This is not idealism — it’s evidence-based practice aligned with CQC’s emphasis on Making Safeguarding Personal and the Human Rights Act (Article 5: Liberty and Security).
📣 What Commissioners Want to Hear
Commissioners increasingly look for evidence that providers understand and reduce restrictive practice through culture, training, and proactive planning. High-scoring tenders demonstrate:
- ✅ Clear governance around restraint and restriction authorisation.
- ✅ Data showing reductions in restrictions or incidents over time.
- ✅ Staff competence in PBS, trauma-informed practice, and de-escalation.
- ✅ Co-production with people supported and families in reviewing restrictions.
This is not about sounding compliant — it’s about demonstrating a values-led system of accountability. Show commissioners how your policies become practice, and how your culture sustains dignity even in crisis situations.
🏗️ Connecting PBS to Human Rights Frameworks
Linking your PBS model to recognised frameworks adds credibility in tenders and inspections. For example:
- ⚖️ Human Rights Act 1998 — particularly Articles 3, 5 and 8.
- 🏛️ Mental Capacity Act 2005 — principles of least restrictive intervention.
- 🧩 CQC Regulation 13 — safeguarding from abuse and improper treatment.
- 🌈 Positive and Proactive Care Guidance (DoH) — promoting non-restrictive environments.
When staff understand how legal frameworks connect to everyday decisions, restrictions reduce naturally. Training should bridge legislation and lived experience, helping teams see the person, not the risk.
📊 Evidence That Proves It Works
To convince commissioners or regulators, show measurable impact:
- 📉 “Incidents requiring physical intervention reduced by 47% over 12 months through PBS refreshers and reflective debriefs.”
- 💬 “People supported report feeling ‘listened to and in control’ in 92% of quarterly feedback forms.”
- 🧠 “All managers trained in trauma-informed leadership; staff wellbeing scores improved by 28%.”
Data turns compassion into evidence. Commissioners don’t just want reassurance — they want results they can defend. Our Tender Review Service ensures your evidence reads clearly and convincingly in moderation meetings.
🧠 Staff Confidence and Reflective Practice
When staff feel anxious, restrictions rise. Building competence means investing in reflective practice and emotional safety.
- 🔁 Use debriefs not as fault-finding but learning opportunities.
- 💬 Encourage staff to express fear or uncertainty without blame.
- 🧩 Include psychological safety and wellbeing in supervision agendas.
Culture change happens when teams feel trusted to learn, not punished for risk. This mindset drives sustainable reduction in restrictive interventions.
🏢 Governance and Oversight
Effective governance ensures transparency around restriction use. Commissioners expect:
- 🗂️ Central registers of restrictions, reviewed monthly by senior management.
- 📈 Trend analysis linking restrictions to incident types or environments.
- 👥 Inclusion of service user representatives in governance meetings.
- 🧾 Annual human-rights audits summarising lessons learned and improvements made.
When governance structures spotlight restrictions as learning opportunities, they send a powerful message: control is not compliance — learning is.
💬 Involving People and Families
Reducing restrictions is everyone’s business. Involving people supported and their families changes narratives of fear into partnerships of trust.
Examples include:
- 🗣️ Co-designing support plans with visual tools that show choices and consequences.
- 👨👩👧 Holding family workshops on PBS and human rights awareness.
- 🎨 Using creative media — stories, art, or digital portfolios — to express autonomy goals.
When people are included, restrictions are questioned, alternatives explored, and trust rebuilt.
🔗 Writing About Restrictions in Tenders
Many providers struggle to describe restrictive practice in tenders without sounding defensive. The key is balance — show humility, learning, and progress.
For example:
“We recognise that restrictive practices can arise from perceived risk rather than actual necessity. Our PBS model ensures every restriction is reviewed weekly, co-produced with the person, and tracked via a digital audit trail. Over the last 12 months, restrictions reduced by 35% through proactive engagement and sensory-based alternatives.”
This phrasing shows accountability, measurable change, and values in action — exactly what evaluators reward.
🧾 Tender-Ready Evidence You Can Include
- 📊 Restriction audit data and trend charts.
- 📑 Case studies showing how alternatives were developed.
- 🧠 Staff training logs for PBS and de-escalation.
- 💬 Testimonials from people supported and families.
- 🔁 Governance meeting minutes showing oversight of restriction reviews.
Commissioners look for assurance that reduction in restrictions is not an aspiration but an embedded practice with measurable governance behind it.
🏗️ From Compliance to Compassionate Accountability
Services once measured by absence of incidents are now measured by presence of dignity. Compliance gets you through inspection; compassion earns you trust. A PBS model rooted in rights creates both.
To sustain progress:
- 🔄 Review every policy through a human-rights lens.
- 🧩 Include reduction targets in your quality improvement plan.
- 🧭 Appoint a “Rights Lead” to oversee restraint reduction programmes.
- 📅 Publish annual outcomes showing transparency and accountability.
🎯 Final Thought
Positive Behaviour Support is not just a clinical model — it’s a moral commitment. It challenges us to replace control with curiosity, and compliance with compassion. When we start with rights, we end with better lives.
In the tendering world, that translates directly into higher scores. Commissioners reward clarity, culture, and evidence that dignity isn’t an add-on — it’s the core of your service model. Write, act, and lead from that principle, and you won’t just reduce restrictions — you’ll redefine what good care looks like.
💼 Rapid Support Products (fast turnaround options)
- ⚡ 48-Hour Tender Triage
- 🆘 Bid Rescue Session – 60 minutes
- ✍️ Score Booster – Tender Answer Rewrite
- 🧩 Tender Answer Blueprint
- 📝 Tender Proofreading & Light Editing
- 🔍 Pre-Tender Readiness Audit
- 📁 Tender Document Review
🚀 Need a Bid Writing Quote?
If you’re exploring support for an upcoming tender or framework, request a quick, no-obligation quote. I’ll review your documents and respond with:
- A clear scope of work
- Estimated days required
- A fixed fee quote
- Any risks, considerations or quick wins
🔁 Prefer Flexible Monthly Support?
If you regularly handle tenders, frameworks or call-offs, a Monthly Bid Support Retainer may be a better fit.
- Guaranteed hours each month (1, 2, 4 or 8 days)
- Discounted day rates vs ad-hoc consultancy
- Use time flexibly across bids, triage, library updates, renewals
- One-month rollover (fair-use rules applied)
- Cancel anytime before next billing date
🚀 Ready to Win Your Next Bid?
Chat on WhatsApp or email Mike.Harrison@impact-guru.co.uk
Updated for Procurement Act 2023 • CQC-aligned • BASE-aligned (where relevant)