How to Align Your Quality Systems with Both CQC and Commissioner Expectations

Social care providers are under pressure from both CQC and local commissioners — but often they want different things. So how do you build one quality system that keeps both regulators happy?


🎯 Start with a Unified Framework

Split systems waste time and create confusion. Instead, create a shared framework that:

  • Aligns with CQC’s five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led)
  • Includes outcome-focused indicators for commissioner reporting
  • Uses one governance structure with clear oversight

📈 Capture Data That Serves Both

Design your monitoring tools so the same data feeds both compliance and improvement:

  • Safeguarding trends — for CQC and contract monitoring
  • Complaints analysis — for both inspection and commissioner reviews
  • Audit results — to support Quality Assurance and reporting obligations

📄 Tailor the Presentation

It’s okay to say the same thing in different ways:

  • Use commissioner language: “cost-effectiveness”, “value-based outcomes”, “place-based care”
  • Use CQC terms: “regulatory compliance”, “evidence-based practice”, “responsive to need”

Same system. Different emphasis.


Written by Mike Harrison, Founder of Impact Guru Ltd — specialists in bid writing and strategy for social care providers

Visit impact-guru.co.uk to browse downloadable strategies, method statements, or get in touch about tender support.

⬅️ Return to Knowledge Hub Index

🔗 Useful Tender Resources

Explore more guides, tools, and services to strengthen your next bid:

✍️ Service support:

🔍 Quality boost:

🎯 Level up:

📦 Toolkits & bundles:

🧭 Browse related articles: