Common Mistakes in Learning Disability Tenders (And How to Avoid Them)

---

Why These Mistakes Matter

Commissioners evaluating tenders for learning disability services are looking for clarity, credibility, and alignment to best practice. Yet many providers weaken their submissions through avoidable mistakes — reducing their chances of success.

Here’s what to watch out for.

---

Top Mistakes to Avoid

• Generic Answers — Failing to tailor responses to the specific service model, people supported, or commissioning priorities.
• Weak Evidence — Lacking clear examples, outcomes data, or commissioner feedback to back up your claims.
• Overlooking Workforce Detail — Not demonstrating specialist training, competence in PBS, communication methods, or safeguarding expertise.
• Poor Structure — Submissions that are hard to navigate, repetitive, or poorly formatted risk losing marks.
• Underestimating Risk Management — Ignoring sector-specific risks such as complex behaviours, transitions, or safeguarding responsibilities.

---

How to Strengthen Your Responses

• Tailor every answer to the specification, using relevant examples from learning disability services.
• Embed robust evidence — outcomes data, testimonials, and commissioner feedback.
• Clearly demonstrate workforce competence in areas commissioners prioritise, including PBS and safeguarding.
• Use clear, structured formatting for ease of scoring.
• Address known risks and show how your service mitigates them effectively.

---

Resources to Strengthen Your Bids

Explore practical resources tailored to learning disability tenders:

➡️ Learning Disability Method Statements Collection
➡️ Strategy Collection (Including Learning Disability and Autism)
➡️ Bid Strategy & Training for Social Care Providers

---

Written by Mike Harrison, Founder of Impact Guru Ltd — specialists in bid writing and strategy for social care providers

Visit impact-guru.co.uk to browse downloadable strategies, method statements, or get in touch about tender support.