Multi-Agency Working in NHS Systems: Governance, Risk and Accountability in Practice

Multi-agency working is a defining feature of modern NHS systems. Providers engaged in Working With ICBs & System Partners and delivering services across NHS Community Service Models & Pathways operate within complex networks of accountability. While collaboration improves outcomes, it also introduces governance, safeguarding and risk management challenges that must be actively managed.

The Reality of Shared Accountability

In multi-agency models, no single organisation controls the full pathway. However, each provider remains accountable for safe care, regulatory compliance and contractual performance. Clarity around decision-making authority, information sharing and escalation routes is therefore essential.

Operational Example 1: Managing Risk Across a Discharge Pathway

Context: A discharge-to-assess pathway involved acute trusts, community providers and social care.

Support approach: A joint escalation framework was developed with defined time thresholds and named leads.

Day-to-day delivery detail: Daily cross-agency huddles reviewed delayed transfers. Risk logs were updated collaboratively. Complex cases were escalated to senior operational leads within 24 hours.

Evidence of effectiveness: Delayed discharge incidents reduced by 21% over six months, with improved clarity around accountability during case reviews.

Operational Example 2: Safeguarding in Integrated Teams

Context: Integrated neighbourhood teams reported uncertainty about safeguarding ownership.

Support approach: The provider clarified safeguarding leadership roles and formalised reporting routes.

Day-to-day delivery detail: Joint safeguarding supervision sessions were introduced. Threshold guidance was shared across agencies. Incident reporting systems were aligned where possible.

Evidence of effectiveness: Safeguarding referrals were more consistent and learning themes were tracked across partner organisations.

Operational Example 3: Information Governance in Shared Care Models

Context: Information sharing barriers delayed decision-making.

Support approach: Data sharing agreements were reviewed and updated.

Day-to-day delivery detail: Staff received refresher training on confidentiality and consent. Secure shared platforms were implemented. Access audits were conducted quarterly.

Evidence of effectiveness: Improved timeliness of documentation and reduced duplication, evidenced through audit findings.

Commissioner Expectation

Commissioner expectation: Providers must evidence clear governance arrangements within multi-agency models. Commissioners expect documented escalation routes, shared risk logs and demonstrable oversight at senior level.

Regulator Expectation

Regulator expectation (CQC): Inspectors expect clarity on roles, responsibilities and safeguarding processes when services are delivered collaboratively. Under the safe and well-led domains, ambiguity is viewed as a risk.

Governance and Assurance Mechanisms

Effective multi-agency working requires:

• Formal partnership agreements
• Clear risk ownership and escalation processes
• Regular joint quality review meetings

Board-level oversight should include system-level risks and shared improvement actions.

Maintaining Quality in Complex Systems

Providers that thrive in integrated systems maintain strong internal governance while engaging transparently with partners. They monitor trends, review incidents collaboratively and evidence learning across organisational boundaries.

---